The Peanut Gallery Reviews 28 Years Later

Steve Titcomb
Jun 26
3 min read

Updated: Jul 7

Is 28 Years Later as Good as Its Predecessors? It Comes Mighty Close!

28 Years Later was released in theaters on 6/20/25

28 Days Later (2002) launched a new era of horror films. It is part of a trilogy that shaped my love for movies. The other two films, Zack Snyder's Dawn of the Dead (2004) and Edgar Wright and Simon Pegg's Shaun of the Dead (2004), made a lasting impact. Before watching these, I had little interest in scary or apocalyptic films. After that experience, I became fascinated with zombies and zombie-like monsters. Now, I eagerly anticipated 28 Years Later. With Danny Boyle (Trainspotting) returning as director and Alex Garland (Civil War) writing the script, my expectations ran high. What I got was not exactly what I expected, but it was a pleasant surprise. The film kept me on the edge of my seat.

Cast Members

The cast is impressive, featuring Jodie Comer (Free Guy), Aaron Taylor-Johnson (Bullet Train), and Ralph Fiennes (In Bruges). I anticipated a star-studded experience. Instead, I was pleasantly surprised by the young talent, Alfie Williams (His Dark Materials). He shines in this coming-of-age story. The setting is terrifying—a world ravaged by a rage virus.

Dr. Kelson, played by Ralph Fiennes, is a standout character. He lives in a village he constructed from bones and skulls. His mysterious nature and unknown motives add depth to the story. He helps our protagonist before sending them on a perilous journey. With the title of the next film, The Bone Temple, I hope we learn more about this intriguing character.

Back to What Works

The original 28 Days Later stood out for its unique use of handheld cameras. This technique created a gritty, realistic vibe. In contrast, 28 Weeks Later struggled to maintain that intensity. Thankfully, 28 Years Later marks a return to form. Boyle incorporated innovative techniques, including the use of iPhones and drones. These choices effectively recreate the intense essence of the first film. The camera style heightens the urgency, making you feel that danger is always nearby.

Story Flaws

Despite its strengths, the film suffers from an incomplete narrative. A sequel is coming in January, but the current story feels stalled. The film does an excellent job of world-building, vital after 28 years since the rage virus outbreak. We need context about the island and how the people cope. The filmmakers introduce a small community and detail the threats posed by evolved infected individuals. The emergence of Alphas provides unexpected layers to the story, adding tension and intrigue.

A Return to Form

28 Years Later presents a world irrevocably changed since the outbreak. Great Britain is quarantined, and infected individuals have evolved within a structured hierarchy. Survivors strive to navigate this perilous landscape, living in isolated communities governed by fear. The film tells a very personal story, with exceptional performances throughout. While it may not surpass the original, it comes close. The haunting sets, gritty aesthetics, and the theme of coming-of-age in a troubled world create a compelling viewing experience. I highly recommend watching it, ideally in theaters.

Thematic Depth

At its core, 28 Years Later explores the themes of survival and humanity. The characters come to terms with the consequences of the virus. Their actions often reflect deep moral dilemmas. Can one retain humanity in a world where danger lurks? The film poses crucial questions about society's resilience in the face of overwhelming odds.

Future Prospects

As we anticipate the sequel, the possibilities seem endless. With The Bone Temple set for release, I hope to see further character exploration and a deeper understanding of their motivations. The dynamic world established in 28 Years Later offers fertile ground for storytelling. Fans are eager to see how the saga continues.